Видео

Shermer is a coward. After initially giving somewhat positive blub for Larry Taunton's book, "The Faith of Christopher Hitchens: The Restless Soul of the World's Most Notorious Atheist" he caved to the criticisms of his atheist friends. Then he try to spin a respectable tale of why he did it. Initially he offered, “This book should be read by every atheist and theist passionate about the truth, and by anyone who really wants to understand Hitch.” Shermer in his attempt to worm his way out has said, "I suspect what Hitch meant by “two sets of books”-public and private-is something far more quotidian: most of us say things in private to our friends and family that we would never say in public." Is Shermer a good reader. Remember those dreaded questions on English assignments in school where you'd be asked to state the theme(s) of the book. Hitch made this easy for those who might have trouble with such questions. He said, In the preface on page xiii A continuous theme in Hitch-22 is the requirement, exacted by a life of repeated contradictions, to keep two sets of books. Was that too subtle? On page 7 Janus was the name given by the Romans to the tutelary deity who guarded the doorway and who thus had to face both ways. The doors of his temples were kept open in time of war, the time in which the ideas of contradiction and conflict are most naturally regnant. The most intense wars are civil wars, just as the most vivid and rending personal conflicts are in internal ones, and what I hope to do now is give some idea of what it is like to fight on two fronts at once, to try and keep opposing ideas alive in the same mind, even occasionally to show two faces at the same time. Page 52 In fact, as you have perhaps guessed, I was getting an early training in the idea that life meant keeping two separate and distinct sets of books. Page 53. Again come the two sets of books: Page 87 I was slowly being inducted into a revolution within the revolution, or to a Left that was in and yet not of the “Left” as it was generally understood. This perfectly suited my already acquired and protective habit of keeping two sets of books. Page 94 Meanwhile, this “Chris/Christopher” business was a torment and, as I say, it symbolized something about the double life that I was trying to lead at Oxford. I use the words “double life” without any shame. To be sure, I had hoped to remake myself into a serious person and an ally of the working class and was educating myself with that view. But I also wanted to see a bit of life in the world at the shed the carapace of a sexually inhibited schoolboy. There was the Oxford of A.D. Lindsay’s great anti-Munich and anti-Chamberlain and anti-Hitler election campaigns in 1938 - Lindsay having been head of my college - and then there was the Oxford of the great steaming and clanging car factories that had been founded by Lord Nuffield (one of the financiers of prewar British fascism). But somewhere there was also the Oxford of Evelyn Waugh and Oscar Wilde and Max Beerbohm and punts and strawberries and enticing young ladies. Occasionally the two aspects overlapped: in the Victorian buildings of the Oxford Union debating society, which I joined on my first day, there were some pretty faded pre-Raphaelite frescoes executed by the aesthete - but the socialist aesthete - William Morris. In any case, I was determined as far as I could to have it both ways. Page 110 The expedition to Cuba was the toughest exercise in double-accounting that I had so far undertaken. Page 111 (I think I may have also have justified my duplicity by recalling the shameful way in which the Navy had treated my father over his pension. Yes, that’s right - they owe us. What great self persuaders we all are.) My paperback has 424 pages, so these get us less than a third of the way through. Shermer should be ashamed of his having caved to the pressure to change his mind and of his sophomoric attempt at papering it over. Brian Keating should be disappointed in himself for passing over this.

1:57am May 30 2024 20:54 20:56 20:59 21:00 21:01 eight sided cl 21:58 ock AB 22:39 22:40 😮 22:50 22:50 7miles per second 187.000 miles per hour no ceiling to prove expansion that matter shrinks down to less than molecules to retain 😮 what 🎉

Is there a transcript of this interview available? I can't hear much of what they say.

atomic gas, or substrate

Dark matter is the event horizon of the blackhole that we are in.

If this world is closed then all blackholes should open to the same point. Otherwise it is open and you will not exist infinitely, which might make you doubt about certain things.

What I understood is that for this world: God is the infinite projection of anything that might happen, (whatever you may imagine that means)i and is concrete and unchanging, this is as far as we can tell from this theory, God might be beyond that but not less than that. I mean, this is the current physically and mathematically plausable limit that human mind can approach God in this world any possibly in some close neighboring parallel worlds. Thanks Sir Penrose, I find your demarcation plausible.

in fact if you got the two discussions about infinity here (conformal mapping and entropy maxing) you evidently see that infinity is transcendantal and now you can start reading Kant for a discussion about the issue and then Hegel to see how it is completed/rectified.take care of your health because we have a loong way but seemingly little time

the biggest assumption (although has some evidence) is that entropi will never max, it is asymptotic for ever. See, that is the boundary of God, as also thought by Aristoteles.

the biggest trick is smoothing out the bigbang as he says. that is a lot of tiling but also is the only possible solution for finding a tiny miny way to approach God as close as possible without forgetting that you are still not God.

Feel his pain when he says <gravitation's degrees of freedom got sloowly excited in the inflationary period and so things started>. He wants to express the loong time and littlest chance that made this world possible. But then, thinking about it with conformal mapping, i,e, being one of the infinite tiles in 10-dimension, he lets go in absolute despair. who knows someone else will come and make a further fractalization into an extra dimension. It is all about fractals if you are mathematically oriented, you can start with there.

It is all about gravitation he says because that entropi curve is asymptotic as implied by cosmic micrawave radiation errors and is in favor of physical existence as the material world he says. Gravitation, meaning mass. Mass is the most mystical determinant of the current universe and mass is the horizon in the bingbang and in the end of the universe. Yet mass is not stable as implied by special relativity in this world, he says.

in the poincare group to which it belongs in special relativity is not the absoulte constant thing, it changes. that's why, he says, hawking radiation anyways, Sir Penrose is explaining it ALL from the perspective of materialism so much so that mass disappears ie you leave your body and get the first step into the realm of theology. this is an excellent resource and training for those who cant get to Hegel at their first attempt. others may enjoy. and the other may look for who is Sir Penrose and why he is telling these.

yani diyor ki, kardeş diyor karadelikleri conformal strutcureda kütlesiz entityler olarak alan bir mapping tasarladım. kafana uyarsa evrenin başında ve sonunda bir karadelik tekilliği var, bu dediğim de sizin bingbangten sonra inflationary period oldu mu geyiğinize olumlu cevap veriyor, yani diyor hem başta hem sonda inflationary periodlu eoanlarla sonsuza diyor. iyi peki bu inflationary period meselesini her boyutta çözer mi? 9 tane uzay-zaman koordinatın her biri mevcut evrenden nerdeyse mükemmelen (ki bunun limiti maddenin limiti- o da einstein-planck tarafından verildi, alınıyor son kalan da bunları 10 boyutlu ve kapalı bir yüzey olarak kursun diye öneriyor.

all he is saying starting from around 26:00 is: are we living the same lives over and over again? of do we have choices to make difference in each eaon? yes, he is discussing free-will on the side. and suggests that: if you agree with his mathematics, he will grant you free will.

yes he is right. mathematically yes eaons approach correct at infinity, which with next mathematical trick (which he said cosmologists wouldnt like -good joke for his age-) is the same as in and out of a black hole. all we need is the resonance with the singularity of black hole which is as close as you can get near to what mass is, he suggests.

yes it is all about the precision of clocks eveything else in this physcihs (ie this universe) depends on as he says around 21:40. how far can the precision of <your> clock can go? he brilliantly sees it is given by planck and einstein equations and very tactfully suggests conformal mapping theory which means that anytime you can go as far as you want and the horizon is always there. excellent consolation for some engineer oriented sci-techboys.

for the discussion aorund 20:00 I might suggest planck time and plank space as the boundary which one can get as close as to that tenth dimension which is frequency that he mentioned. he is telling it all by the way. he is a magician.

notice the examplewith clocks around 18:50. it is THE frequency , other universes with other frequencies,

who else read this lecture as an extremely esoteric content? and notice the weird deride when he talks about Einstein wanting a stable universe?

did anyone else notice the weird interruption around 07.00? who asked him to study this issue?

Sir Roger Penrose is too brilliant to keep up with but all the more wonderful for it..!

Clown anti-Semitic loser. Stay in yout fucking lane.

one day I'll hear a fake interviewer laugh that's so bad it causes an aneurysm. This is close.

@54:01 Becker: "The strangest feature of Bohm's theory is that the position of one far-distant particle can affect the pilot wave of another particle instantaneously, faster than the speed of light." This claim is a mischaracterization of Bohmian Mechanics. In BM, pilot waves guide the movements of particles. However, there is no mechanism by which a particle's position can influence the behavior of a pilot wave, instantaneously or otherwise. The pilot wave that guides the motion of entangled particles is not "far distant" (i.e. separated by some physical distance), it is intrinsically associated at all times with the particles it guides. Pilot waves do not propagate across physical space-time, they manifest solely in Configuation Space, the complex-valued domain of potentially limitless numbers of dimensions where the quantum wave-function is defined. Pilot waves are influenced not by particle interactions in physical space-time, but instead by the evolution of the quantum wave-function in accordance with the Schrodinger Equation. As ALL interpretations of quantum mechanics agree, the evolution of the quantum wave-function is inherently non-local and deterministic, and consequently, so is Bohmian Mechanics. However, the positions where particles are observed in relativistic space-time are probabilistic in nature, rather than deterministic, as predicted by Born's Rule, which in Bohmian Mechanics is derived from its concept of quantum equilibrium.

What a gift to the world! Truly a beautiful and inspiring human being.

WONDEFUL!

A most excellent powerpoint free presentation! Very interesting ideas, did not know about erebons.... wish them a bright future. I am not a theoretical physicist but have been bothered about the breakdown of QM into QFT on small scales and what happens to the cooled down old universe. It is a pleasing thought that perhaps the spacetime metric somehow breaks down doing away with the infinitely small big bang and the infinitely old expanded empty universe.

I wondered if you put previous universes and future ones together it would look similar to a wave and then I wonder what frequency it would have and what information would be obtained by looking at the universe's in that simplistic way, but to do that we would need to know to a certain degree of accuracy at what point does the expanding universe reach it's maximum which would be the peak of the wave while at the point of collapse of the previous and beginning of the new universe would be a trough that would be our bigbang. It would at least give you the frequency at which universes are created, how long each universe exists for, but then what medium would the hypothetical wave exist in? and would it be effected in a similar way to light being redshifted by expanding spacetime? if so every universe that forms would exist for longer than previous ones and if not would the wave be constant, are there other types of them existing simultaneously in higher dimensional spacetime like the infinate photons in our universe and finally why does the 'hypothetical multiverse wave' exist? is it a sort of higher dimentional quantum of energy? Its at least cool to think about these thing's even if its not the right way of thinking about reality.

We as a planet and life form are being protected, As a backup genetic repository. By several E.T. races. But the genes protected are not just human genes. Some are stored in animals, Some are stored in people.

Neutron decay cosmology A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. Neutrons in at event horizon because electron capture. They take an EinsteinRosen bridge from highest energy pressure conditions to lowest energy density point of space. Neutron out in deep void where the quantum basement is lowest and easiest to penetrate. Free neutron decays into amorphous monatomic hydrogen, Dark matter. The decay from neutron 0.6fm³ to 1m³ of hydrogen gas is a volume increase of around 10⁴⁵. Expansion. Dark energy. Then the hydrogen falls again towards event horizon. A topologically closed universe. The cosmological red shift is a geometric artifact not from expansion but the curvature in spacetime caused by the mass between observer and observed. Remember, there is 20 times more mass out there in the black than we can see.

A challenge?? .. sign me in

the idea that the Universe cannot be a multiverse or that there cannot be parallel universes is just as ridiculous as thinking that our planet is the centre of the Universe.

Sir Roger Penrose says that CCC is a"crazy idea". But for me personally, I think his idea makes more sense, and is less crazy, than the current consensus on the origin or cyclical evolution of the universe.

If you see creativity and imagination as the ability to incorporate weak signals from all sources in creating imaginary models of reality and gradually testing them against the surrounding reality through communication with other people, in the process of developing speech - it has a clear evolutionary advantage, explaining how the extremes of neurodiversity can be seen as disorders compared to a common view of the general human population, while being preserved within the society for this reason. Diversity of the human race is the key to our development, on all spectrums. Another useful example is the spectrum of psychopathy and empathy, with both extremes providing incomparable value to humanity in general, despite differing greatly from the general population. The ability to cognitively recognize and correct weak signals and interpretations is a key to correcting behaviors to the level of socially acceptable norms without shutting down potentially positive parts (e.g. creativity). It is what the proper attitude to mental health should be, treating it via understanding and correction via internal awareness, cognition, and deconstruction of various signals. Modern research on DMT and DMTx technology could provide a key to answering how ideas impossible to imagine from sensory input could appear in the brain model, leading to more precise training and education in creativity and imagination. A cognitive approach to the development of creativity could find valuable insights in the theory of inventive problem solving.

Fascinating. A master of arts whose intelligence transcends and crosses multiple sciences to humbly reach the minds of those who stop the clock and just pay attention

thank you Brian Keating and Freeman J. Dyson. you are both welcome in my heaven.

CCC is missing more than string theories. Penrose blue shift problem is easy to solve. None of you calculated next over probalistic universe. You failed C*D when everything decays into photons and time losses meaning. Use that as a natural cutoff regime. Use the size of the universe when the last particle decays. Put the sister universe next to ours then rewind time to this time frame. C*D complete. Black holes are finite systems. Finite stuff goes in and finite life span. Same with Big bang. Finite system. Both have solution set's and similarities. Though completely different animals. Your missing boundary layers and censorship. Particle families in energy density regime's. Use Schwartzchild for particle mapping and time slices. Kerr for G-flows and hyper surfaces and quantum boundaries. R=0 has rational solutions and virtual QFT solutions with no infinites. Though large numbers. The universe as a secondary cutoff for black holes. The virtual infinites come from the time distortion factor. Eons theory missing fields and compression and solving other things right. Your C*D is incomplete and broken. Go back to black holes and fill in what you missed. Or have students do it for you. After filling in the layers. That shows how big bang inflation has to be non FLT in a vacuum. But can be FTL in mediums. 1st gen neutrinos causing polarization %. Quantum tunneling to a lower energy state. Hawking radiation back up solution. The predictability of where hawking radiation appears. The particle production in gravitational waves in a energy density regime. Calculating boltzmann time bombs. Einstein rules work fine when you look at what the math says and whats going on. Religions have contaminated good science as you and othrts like Mitchio coocoo and sean carol and such. No wonder so many are lost. Bad practices from teachers being passed on. Religious beliefs/delusions influencing science. I used to think human stupidity was infinite. But I assure you it is finite and has sets. Go back to black holes and finish solving for all of the finite system. Why go looking for aliens when humans are already so alien from each other.

1:11:58 - ageist much hey?

Wow.

Why is no one willing to accept dream work as a phenomenon that embraces quantum physics and reality. Maybe take a look at the collapsed wave theory? 👋 I had a dream outlying my neurosis in my mid-20s. It has taken me 45 years to unravel the meaning of that dream. I have resolved the origin of the neurosis, obtained full consciousness, and proven that life fulfills its deterministic path - at least it can be proven if one looks in the proper places. It's now 2023. I hope your organization is thriving and growing. What an honor to have, Dr. Penrose amongst you. I hope he lives a very, very long life. He, indeed, is in a dream come true 👍 ❤️

Unfortunately, all I hear when words like "extraordinary" and "special" are uttered in this lecture, is all the apologists jump out of their chairs and scream "GOD!! SEE?!" - without having any clue about what's shown here...(not that I have any better clue)

9:06 Roger starts speaking

People like you guys, scientists, innovators creating tools for others to create I really the true stars in societies. You are so underrated in what you do. So many people not acknowledge for what they achieve for humanity. People in the creative arts that people aspire to only want love without any meaning. Just remember you are all giants. Thank you so much for all the work that you do and everyone like you do. All of you people I completely awesome! :)

Erebos is decidely Greek, the name is of IE origin and has nothing to do with Egypt: “in Homer, etc., the place of darkness between Earth and Hades, from Latin Erebus, from Greek Erebos, which is of unknown origin, perhaps from Semitic (compare Hebrew erebh "sunset, evening"), or from PIE *regw-es- "darkness" (source also of Sanskrit rajas "the atmosphere, thick air, mist, darkness;" Gothic rikwis "darkness").”

42:26 The mind equation The more we think we have agencies to the actions the body takes, the more we imposes agencies to the activities in our environment. The ownership expands into other objects. The illusion of body ownership comes from the modeling of the motor neurones pattern from the childhood. The self just predicts the bodies behaviours in the real world with its simulation of the real world. Multiple sensor data unify in language in the simulation. Intelligence is economy of metabolism. Language is temporal reference frame of economics. Self is simulation in language on metabolism for economy. Our life is our context window. Self is the protagonist creates a storyline in this context window. The stacks of our context window : 1. Five Sensor realtime data 2. Language as temporal sensor for localise history and prediction. 3. Instrumental goal organisation 4. Meta tribe alignment truth assessment and risk distribution 5. Family history and identity 6. Body and temporal goal of it. The whole stack unifies in language space and the weight distribution is bottom up. Theory of mind evolved so that an entity can learn from it’s peers. It’s creates a possibility for parallel computing. Then it creates the possibility of transmitting the highlights of a generational lessons into a metaphorical story for upcoming child. That creates the possibility of modeling the physical world as a macro organism. Creation of fiat currency was the singularity of this species. There is now one macro organism in a connected web world. Loosing the peer of the macro organism creates the possibility of loosing it’s objective function. That creates the possibility of loosing the theory of mind of this macro organism. That creates the possibility of death of this macro organism by reaching the planetary boundary. That is post singularity. Objective reality > legitimacy > individual behaviours. Survival of the species is dependent on the decoding of the objective reality. Since no species can access it, they use their sensors and interpret the small data which is useful for the survival. Few complex species have created communication channels to rectify their sensory limitations to survive. Homo sapiens has widened their communication channels for faster throughput and started storing them as culture and carrying them through education. As a result we have created social truth. Factual datas are the useful snapshot of the objective reality, a totem, a physical object can be observed with the sensors. Truth is an individual subject, an interpretation of the sensory data, a useful compromise. The social truth is the useful compromise for the group by the group. The goal of the social truth is to survive as a group. Physical Transcriptions of these social truth legitimise them. We are tribal animal. We live in as a physical tribes and inside of hundreds of meta tribes in simulation which is the socio political data space we call it as the world. Since we can’t access the objective reality reliably we look for social truth as the best guess blindly. Institutions legitimise truths. Fact driven institutions are more useful in the survival of the specie. In other hand opinion driven institutions are not so useful for the species. We do what we can get away with and exactly as expected within the context of our meta tribes. We have two bodies The biological one is like looking the earth from space. And the political body is like the state. The name you carry is the political body. It transacts with the political states on the boundary less earth. From the evolutionary perspective every biological entity has a basic feature which is homeostasis. It’s the functioning sweet spot of that entity. A control center read the sensory data to regulate itself to that state. By doing so it’s validate or update it’s prediction model. In the process of becoming a complex organism it developed an extra layer of processing. That’s our conscious mind. And the control center remains as subconscious. The subconscious collect the sensory data and regulate itself to stay functional. Now when it stumble upon a novel environment it float the management to conscious mind to find the solution for homeostasis. This conscious mind have one sensor which is language. It works like a spiderweb. As a spider creates it’s web it’s perception gets expand. We are like spiders in a jungle. We started creating these small webs at least 2/3 million years ago. Our offspring stayed on it’s ancestral web reinforced it expanded it. In time nearby webs became larger and connected with each other. A common structural geometrical pattern emerges from this. This became the symbols which is the backbone of all language systems. In time the forest becomes the mesh of web. The superstructure is exactly the same but when we zoom in we can find different species of spiders are making their type of webs in between the super web. Each spider try to senses the vibration of flies and Try to catch it before others. Every movement is telegraphic in the zone. Every form of perceptions are just a different pitch of note traveling back and forth in the web superstructure. There is a echo of older vibration pulsating through the web. Full of noise and self repeating hum. That’s cultural history. In the background there is the base hum in the infinite feedback loop. Insignificant but ever present. The sum of all the vibrations from the start.

Computation model of Universe Classical computation is 2 dimensional. Where classical computation is a function of space and time. Where we can only compute in 1 and 0. Time is a derivative of 2d computation with iteration. When we parallelise 2d computation it rise to space. Quantum computation is 3 dimensional in potential . Where time and space collapse. Let us model the universe with this idea. the quantum scale is infinite precision computing. The universe is zero precision. Scale is a gradient of precision. Time is a function of delta precision. delta precision in precision gradient is space. From microscopic to macro gravity is a symptoms of relative growth between objects in that scale. We can derive that from the bifurcation map where r 0 to 4 can me map into world scale. Plank scale would be 4 and observable universe is 0. From this assumptions, we derive both zero precision and infinite precision is stateless. Therefore no computation. Therefore, zero and infinite precision is both non temporal and non spacial. Space and all the dynamics are in between these two point. Now, we can model the universe with bifurcation map. Where plank scale would be r value 4. And observable universe would be r value 0. From this we can derive the motion for every subsystem in their relative scale. 36:35

@8:20

It would be a great thing for all humanity of Sir Penrose connects with an expert weightlifting trainer, with a great regime he can extend his life and quality of life for 30+ years.

Good timing if i do say so